7 vols bound in 4, 4to (255 x 200 mm), pp. [vii], xxiv, c, [vi], 242; [iv], xxii, [ii], 336, , [1, blank]; [iv], xxiv, [viii], 314; xxv, [i, blank], [vi], 368, ; xxviii, 414; lxiv, 578, , [1, blank]; [x], [iii]–xii, 273, [1, blank], with 133 plates (82 folding); occasional browning; contemporary white blindstamped pigskin with morocco labels to spines, gilt; a little soiled and rubbed; slight worming to spines of three vols; tail-band of first volume snagged; all vols with the early ownership inscriptions to title-pages of Loewenburg College, Vienna.
US $4280 €3625
First published in 1727–30 but this present edition is the most complete, being the first to include the Supplement a l’histoire de Polybe . . . contenant les nouvelles découvertes sur la guerre, par le même; lettre critique d’un officier hollandois; & sentimens d’un homme de guerre sur le systême militaire du Chevalier de Folard. Avec les reponses a ces critiques.
This translation of Polybius’s Histories is used by Folard to promote his ideas on military strategy, mainly those of reviving the use of shock tactics and replacing the line with the column formation. In the Histories, Polybius, who is considered Thucydides’s successor and a forefather of scholarly historical research, traced the rise and expansion of the Roman Empire from 220BC to the fall of Carthage in 146BC. His examination of the Romans’s various military campaigns is used by Folard to advocate the use of classical methods of warfare, a popular concept in French Enlightenment military thinking.
‘The power of Ancient precedent in the eighteenth century was reinforced by the absence of any compartmentalised feeling for a period and the belief that the principles of war and politics were unchanging . . . . It is significant that one of the foremost of the contemporary military writers was a man who sought to relate classical military history to the modern time . . . . Folard’s exposition was a platform for expounding his own ideas on the art of war, and particularly the advantages of the column, as outlined in his first volume . . . . [He] remained one of the most influential military writers of the century. In his advocacy of the column, which he derived from what Polybius had to write about the Macedonian phalanx, Folard inaugurated a dogmatic and geometrical tendency in French military literature. As his friend Marshal Saxe noted, Folard regarded his soldiers as automata and assumed that they must be brave all the time. On the positive side Folard wrote usefully on matters of detail, he contributed to the growing belief that good generalship was a question of hard work and not just the happy result of inborn gifts, and he persuaded Europe that “tactics” were worthy of serious study’ (Duffy, Military experience in the age of reason pp. 53–4).
Folard (1669–1752) a French soldier who fought under the duc the Vendôme and Charles XII of Sweden during the War of the Spanish Succession, distinguishing himself at the battles of Cassano, Malplaquet and the siege of Lille, developed his ideas on military formation whilst recovering after being wounded in battle in 1705. ‘An annalysis of Folard’s military writings brings to light not a connected theory of war as a whole, but a great number of independent ideas, sometimes valuable and suggestive, but far more often extravagant. The central point of his tactics was his proposed column formation for infantry. Struck by the apparent weakness of the thin line of battle of the time . . . he desired to substitute the shock of a deep mass of troops for former methods of attack, and further considered that in defence a solid column gave an unshakable stability to the line of battle. Controversy at once centred itself upon the coumn. Whilst some famous commanders, such as Marshal Saxe and Guido Starhemberg, approved it and put it into practice, the weight of military opinion throughout Europe was opposed to it, and eventually history justified this opposition. Amongst the most discriminating of his critics was Frederick the Great, who is said to have invited Folard to Berlin. The Prussian king certainly caused a précis to be made by Colonel von Seers, and wrote a preface thereto expressing his views . . . . Thus began the controversy between line and column formations, which long continued and influenced the development of tactics up to the most modern times. Folard’s principal adherents in the 18th century were Joly de Maizeroy and Mesnil Durand’ (Encyclopaedia Britannica).
Brunet IV 791.
You may also be interested in...
‘AESTETHIC OF FEAR’ DILICH, Wilhelm.
Peribologia seu muniendorum locor[um] ratio.
First Latin edition of this monumental work on architecture and fortifications, a book produced by father and son. The imprint makes clear that the son, Johann Wilhelm, not only was responsible for the magnificent plates but also edited and published the work ‘edita sumptus et typos suppeditante Joanne Wilhelmo Dilichio F[ilio] architecto (‘published at the cost of his son J.W. Dilich, architect, who supplied the type’). The original German edition was published the previous year, 1640.
FOSSÉ, Charles Louis François.
Idées d’un militaire pour la disposition des troupes confiées aux jeunes officiers dans la défense et l’attaque des petits postes.
First edition. ‘Ouvrage estimé’ (Brunet). A splendidly illustrated military treatise and excellent example of French colour printing written by a French infantry officer and mathematician who distinguished himself in the Seven Years’ War.