2 vols. in one, 16mo., engraved frontispiece portrait of Shelley, title-page with lyre vignette; a good copy in contemporary brownish-green binder’s cloth, hinges cracked, front cover reattached; inscribed by William Michael Rossetti, ‘This was the first Shelley wh. Gabriel & I got & read – It has been re-bound since then’, this inscription dated 1844 retrospectively in accordance with his practice of ‘regularly insert[ing] into his volumes signed annotations detailing the provenance, history or significance of a particular book’ (Fredeman).
US $2674 €2267
Undated variant (presumably a later reissue) of Daly’s collected edition of 1839, read to pieces by the young Dante Gabriel Rossetti.
This volume has a well-documented history. Dante Gabriel consciously ‘adopted a nonchalantly bohemian lifestyle, rejecting his mother’s evangelical Anglican traditions’ (Oxford DNB). ‘Doughty records her alarm on hearing that he (aet. 16) “was reading indecent books”. Gabriel strenuously denied the accusation, which was due, he discovered, to his having expressed the intention to purchase a copy of Shelley’s poems. In spite of his mother’s suspicions, however, he bought the Shelley, and, as William Michael writes elsewhere, “surged through his pages like a flame”’ (Fredeman). William Michael and Christina, Dante Gabriel's close juniors, would perforce have been party to his enthusiasm.
This was their first encounter with the ‘ever-glorious Shelley’, who was to become W. M. Rossetti’s literary hero. ‘When Moxon, towards 1869, projected a new edition of Shelley, he could think of no one fitter than Rossetti to edit it and write the prefatory memoir’ (Garnett). His edition came to press in 1870, and was revised in 1878; between 1878 and 1895 he wrote many articles for The Athenaeum on Shelley and Italian literature, lectured on Shelley, and was a chairman of the Shelley Society.
A founder-member of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, William Michael had not inconsiderable artistic sensibilities, but because he was neither poet nor artist, these sensibilities found another escape through the ‘role of amanuensis, garnerer and editor. In these areas he was indefatigable.’ He ‘seems from his youth to have been conscious of posterity. His family’s heritage was scrupulously preserved, as were the records of his own involvement with the famous men and movements of his time’ (Fredeman). He assiduously documented the careers of his siblings over a lifetime of literary achievement.
R. S. Garnett, ‘Introduction’ to Letters about Shelley, 1917; W. E. Fredeman, ‘Introduction’ to Books from the Libraries of Christina, Dante Gabriel, and William Michael Rossetti (Bertram Rota catalogue 180, 1973). The books in the Rota catalogue were largely acquired from W. M. Rossetti’s granddaughter, Imogen Dennis; this was item 84.
You may also be interested in...
SWIFT, Jonathan, attributed author.
The Life and genuine Character of Doctor Swift. Written by Himself.
First edition. Authorship of this fine poem has long been debated. It was explicitly repudiated by Swift himself, though it has much in common with Verses on the Death of Doctor Swift and Faulkner printed it as genuine in 1746.
Solid philosophy asserted, against the fancies of the ideists: or, the method of science further illustrated. With reflexions on Mr. Locke’s essay concerning human understanding. By J. S.
First edition. The best-known work of the Roman Catholic philosopher and controversialist John Sergeant (1623–1707). ‘The two philosophers to whom he is most opposed are Descartes and Locke, the “Ideists” whose distinction between ideas in the mind and external reality he saw as sowing the seeds for an incurable scepticism which he strongly attacked, but less clearly refuted. Locke is the main subject of his assault, no doubt because by this stage in the late 1690s it was Locke’s philosophy which was the centre of attention. In place of the strongly repudiated “Way of Ideas” Sergeant attempts to set a philosophy of “Notions”, a concept which some have seen, though on the basis of little evidence, as influencing Berkeley. Ideas Sergeant rejects because they close us off from the world of things – “Solid Philosophy” … Sergeant is a curious figure in the history of late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century philosophy, combining his scholastic roots with glimpses of the modern world into an unstable synthesis of Catholic theology (albeit unorthodox), scholastic philosophy and elements of Lockean epistemology, the latter appearing to be a source on which he drew (as Locke noted) despite his overt rejection of much of its content’ (Dictionary of seventeenth-century British philosophers, p. 724).