AN INFRINGEMENT OF CIVIC LIBERTIES OR A NECESSITY IN COMPLEX TIMES?

The history of two acts: entitled, an Act for the safety and preservation of His Majesty’s person and government against treasonable and seditious practices and attempts, and, an Act for the more effectually preventing seditious meetings and assemblies; including the proceedings of the British parliament, and of the various popular meetings, societies, and clubs, throughout the kingdom; ....

London, G.G. and J. Robinson, 1796.

8vo, [1] blank, pp. xlviii, 828, [1] blank; a very good copy, uncut and partly unopened in the original blue boards, slightly worn at extremities, head of tan paper spine chipped, joints cracked but holding, light water stain at the head of the central pages, occasional spotting but a good copy.

£750

Approximately:
US $967€828

Make an enquiry

Added to your basket:
The history of two acts: entitled, an Act for the safety and preservation of His Majesty’s person and government against treasonable and seditious practices and attempts, and, an Act for the more effectually preventing seditious meetings and assemblies; including the proceedings of the British parliament, and of the various popular meetings, societies, and clubs, throughout the kingdom; ....

Checkout now

First edition of this account of the Pitt and Grenville Acts, introduced following the stoning of King George III’s carriage on his way to the State opening of Parliament in 1795.

The ‘Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act’ stated that those who ‘caused, imagine, invent, devise or intend death or destruction, or any bodily harm tending to death or destruction’ to the monarch ‘shall suffer pains of death, and also lose and forfeit as in cases of high treason,’ (p. 772). The ‘Seditious Meetings Act’ was focused on preventing any plotting or planning to disrupt the State. It ordered that permission and a licence was required for meetings where political policies were discussed and that such meetings should be restricted to no more than fifty people.

The long preface is in fact a substantial essay on the nature of liberty and on the complex nature of the social contract. Anonymously written and as yet unattributed, it includes remarks on the American War of Independence and revolves around the ambiguous nature of the two bills, can be seen as both an ‘infringement on the constitutional liberties of the subject’ yet as ‘absolutely necessary by the complexities of our times’ (Preface, [p. iii]).

ESTC T70590. Not common: not at Cambridge, or Princeton.

You may also be interested in...

NAVY WARRANT [TIMBER.]

To our worthy friends [Sr Edward Fuss Knt, John Smith, John Stevens, Silvanus Wood and William Selwin Esqrs] Justices of the Peace in the County of [Gloucester] or any two of them …

Unrecorded(?) part-printed warrant; pursuant to the Act for providing carriage by land and by water for the use of his Majesties Navy and Ordnance, the parties names above are requested to provide fourteen carriages to Daniel Furzer for the transport of two hundred loads of timber from ‘in and about the parishes of Barckley [Berkeley] and Uly [Uley]’ unto Berkeley Pill and Frampton Pill on the Severn. The request came in the closing months of the Second Anglo-Dutch War, when the financial position of the Navy was increasingly desperate.

Read more

ELIZABETHAN SCHOOL BOOK OCLAND, Christopher.

Anglorum praelia, ab Anno Domini. 1327. anno nimirum primo inclytissimi Principis Eduardi eius nominis tertii, usque ad Annu[m] Domini 1558. Carmine summatim perstricta. Item. De pacatissimo Angliae statu, imperante Elizabetha, compendiosa narratio . . . Hiis Alexandri Nevilli Kettum: tum propter argumenti similitudinem, tum propter orationis elegantiam adiunximus.

First published in 1580, this is one of three closely similar 1582 editions of Ocland’s Anglorum proelia which add two works at the end: Ocland’s Eirēnarchia (a continuation of Anglorum proelia first published in 1582) and Alexander Neville’s account of the 1549 Norfolk rising, De furoribus Norfolciensium Ketto duce (first published in 1575).

Read more