Two works in one vol., fol., ff. 8; ; text in double columns, woodcut initials; some light foxing and staining to first work; very good copies in recent blue/grey paper wrappers.
US $2410 €2164
Added to your basket:
Quaesitum novum pulcherrimum, ac optatissimum contra Scotum, ac communem viam in quo enucleatur an de subiecto praecognoscatur si est aut de eodem aliqua demonstrationis spetie inquiratur ... Ioanne Elysio ... dilucidatore, atq[ue] locupletatore.
Scarce first editions of two early works on Aristotelian logic by Girolamo Balduino, an important member of the Paduan school of Aristotelian commentators who have been recognised in recent scholarship as a crucial link between traditional logic and science and the new, Galilean methodologies. In addition to Averroes, Albertus Magnus, Aquinas, and Duns Scotus, these works make reference to Balduino’s fellow Paduan philosophers Thomas Cajetan, Agostino Nifo, Marcantonio Zimara, and Giovanni Francesco Burana.
Balduino greatest success came during his years in Naples, where both of these works were published. His balanced assessment of the usefulness and limitations of Aristotelian logic in modern science met its most vocal opponent in Giacomo Zabarella, whose largely unwarranted attack upon Balduino generated a prolific diatribe. The result was a new separation of philosophy from theology and then metaphysics. Though Balduino’s thought cannot be strictly considered an immediate precursor of Galileo’s work, it is nonetheless the case that it played an important role in the formation of the scientist’s thinking on logic and science: Galileo cites Balduino’s Questions in his works on epistemology and logic preserved in the manuscript MS Gal 46 (see Wallace, Prelude to Galileo, Essays on Medieval and Sixteenth-Century Sources, p. 197).
EDIT 16 4023, USTC 812086; EDIT 16 4020, USTC 812084. Outside Italy we have only traced copies of the first work at Chicago and Texas, and of the second work at Texas only.
You may also be interested in...
PREPARING ROMANTICISM HEMSTERHUIS, François.
Sophyle ou De la philosophie.
First edition, a fine copy of this work by the Dutch philosopher and aesthetician François Hemsterhuis (1721-1790), whose ideas influenced the German romantic thinkers F. H. Jacobi and J. G. Herder as well as the two Schlegels and Novalis. Sophyle belongs to the second period of Hemsterhuis’s career during which he wrote four Platonic dialogues for Amalia Golitsyna. Taking the form of a discussion between Sophyle and Euthyphron, beginning ‘Oh, que la Philosophie est une bonne chose’, it examines the relation between the soul and the body and is also an attack on materialism. A fine example of printing, with a narrow column of text surrounded by wide margins, Sophyle was printed, like most of Hemsterhuis’s works, in a small and anonymous edition for private circulation. ‘Professor P. J. Buijnsters has associated Hemsterhuis’s printing commissions with the mysterious translator, factotum, and secret agent, Charles-Guillaume-Frédéric Dumas (ca. 1725-80). No one, it seems, has identified the printer or printers of Hemsterhuis’s falsely-signed ‘Paris’ imprints, but since the days of Barbier they have been localized to Haarlem and Den Haag’ (Stoddard).
ROME’S WATER SUPPLY AND FLOODING OF THE TIBER MODIO, Giovanni Battista.
Il Tevere ... doue si raggiona in generale della natura di tutte le acque, et in particolare di quella del fiume di Roma. Rome, Vincenzo Luchini, 1556.
CASTIGLIONE, Giacomo. Trattato dell’inondatione del Tevere ... dove si discorre delle caggioni, e rimedij suoi, e si dichiarano alcune antichità, e luoghi di autori vecchi. Con una relatione del diluuio di Roma del 1598 ... E con un modo stupendo col quale si saluarono molte famiglie in Castel Sa[n]t’Angelo. Novamente posto in luce.
Rare first editions of two works on the river Tiber and the health implications of the quality of its water and of its regular flooding. A physician and follower of Filippo Neri, Modio (d. 1560) was moved to write Il Tevere by the regular flooding of the Tiber and subsequent sanitary crises in Rome (during which he fell gravely ill and was lucky to survive). Arguing against the findings of Alessandro Petronio in his De aqua Tiberina (1552), Modio demonstrates that the water of the Tiber was far from healthy and should not be drunk. Hippocrates had early established the importance of water-supply to health, and one of the chief glories of ancient Rome had been its water, and Modio here appeals to cardinal Ranuccio Farnese to push for the restoration of the city’s ancient aqueducts.