8vo, pp. 152, a few leaves near the end slightly browned, but a very good copy in near-contemporary polished calf, upper board neatly rejointed.
Added to your basket:
A Dissertation upon the Epistles of Phalaris, Themistocles, Socrates, Euripides, and Others; and the Fables of Aesop.
First edition, the separate issue, of what is arguably the greatest and most familiar exposure of a literary forgery, demolishing the attribution of celebrated ‘ancient’ texts on linguistic and historical grounds.
‘Richard Bentley (1662–1742) was and remains the greatest of English classical scholars. His reputation was made by his Dissertation on Phalaris, the final crushing blow in the Battle of the Books’ that began as an academic squabble and had escalated into a long and bitter controversy (PMM 178).
Bentley prepared his impeccably learned but highly readable Dissertation at the request of his friend William Wotton who in 1694 had attempted to refute Sir William Temple’s thesis, in An Essay upon Ancient and Modern Learning, that the ‘ancients’ excelled the ‘moderns’ in nearly all branches of learning and literary performance. Unfortunately Sir William had chosen the Epistles of Phalaris and the Fables of Aesop as two of his leading cases. Bentley told Wotton at the time that these ‘ancient’ works were far more recent than Temple realized, and in 1696-7, preparing a second edition of his Reflections upon an Essay, Wotton asked him to supply the evidence. Bentley’s seemingly effortless proof emerged unchallengeably victorious, and remains a model of historical and philological demonstration. Phalaris, for example, was the tyrant of Acragas in Sicily in the mid sixth century BC, but the Epistles are written in Attic, not Sicilian Doric Greek, and several towns mentioned were founded long after his time.
The Dissertation appeared in two forms in 1697, separately, as here, and appended to the second edition of Wotton’s Reflections. The title-page and printed text of both issues are identical. It may be that the separate issue was called for to accommodate purchasers of the first edition of Reflections (1694).
Following the inevitable replies from Temple’s adherents, Bentley revised and massively extended his treatment of Phalaris in 1699, but he reserved his arguments about the other ‘ancient’ epistles for a second volume which never appeared. Hence the 1697 edition is valuable not only as the first appearance of Bentley’s treatment of Phalaris, it also preserves his exposures of the equally important classical forgeries of Themistocles, Socrates, Euripides, and Aesop.
Wing B 1928 (and as appended to Reflections W 3659).
You may also be interested in...
[KRAG, Niels, editor.]
NICOLAUS, of Damascus. Ex Nicolai Damasceni universali historia seu de moribus gentium libris excepta Iohannis Stobaei collectanea, quae Nicolaus Cragius latina fecit, et seorsum edidit.
First edition thus. Comprises observations on the customs of different peoples (Iberians, Celts, Phrygians, Assyrians, Spartans and so on) from the Augustan historian Nicolaus of Damascus’ Universal history, only fragments of which have come down to us (in this case via Stobaeus). The text is printed here in the original Greek together with a Latin translation by the Danish historian and philologist Niels Krag (or Cragius, c. 1550–1602).
[ROYAL PRUSSIAN SOCIETY OF SCIENCES.]
Miscellanea berolinensia ad incrementum scientiarum, ex scriptis societati regiae scientiarum exhibitis, edita, continuatio I. cum figuris et indice materiarum.
First continuation of Leibniz’s Miscellanea berolinensia. First appearing in 1710, the publication of the Miscellanea was revived in 1723 as the official journal of the Royal Prussian Society of Sciences after the death of Leibniz, its founding President. The Continuatio comprises articles on literature, mathematics, and mechanics, with contributions by the astronomers Johann Wilhelm Wagner, Johann Philipp von Wurzelbauer, and Christfried Kirch, the mathematicians Chrisoph Langhansen, Jakob Hermann, and Philippe Naudé the younger, and the linguists Gisbert Cuper, Johann Georg Wachter, and Justus Christoph Dithmar.