12mo, pp. vi, 7-247, , [1 (blank)]; very few marks and creases, marginal paper flaw to F4, with ‘Dorlhac Cure’ in a contemporary hand at the foot of p. vi and late 19th-century manuscript note on the author loosely inserted; a very good copy uncut in contemporary patterned wrappers printed in red, yellow, and blue; wrappers worn with a few tears, spine repaired.
US $1266 €1057
Added to your basket:
Traité de la légitimité du prêt lucratif, ouvrage utile & instructif pour les laïques & pour les ecclésiatiques.
First and only edition of this work on interest and usury. According to Dorlhac, while the profits from interest are legitimate and those from usury illegitimate, one cannot categorically approve or condemn one or the other, since it depends on circumstances: if loans to the poor ought to be interest free, there is no obligation to offer the same advantage to the rich. Dorlhac cites Scripture, the Church Fathers, Church Councils and Papal decrees to show how religious opinion is in accord with natural laws and with his own conclusions on these questions.
The Traité was presented to authorities for approval on 26 August 1788 by the Paris bookseller Jean-François Née de la Rochelle, listed first among the publishers on the last leaf, but was struck on 10 October, among the last books to be forbidden by the censors of the ancien régime.
Very rare: OCLC records no copies in the US, while COPAC notes only the copy at Senate House Library.
Goldsmiths’ 13620; INED 1454; Quérard II, p. 581; Dawson, Confiscations at Customs: Banned Books and the French Booktrade during the last Years of the Ancien Régime (Oxford, 2006), appendix F, no. 94.
You may also be interested in...
Ein Blick in den Zukunftsstaat. Produktion und Konsum im Sozialstaat. Mit einer Vorrede von Karl Kautsky.
First edition of this utopian discourse on the industrial and commercial composition of the ideal socialised state. The most common attribution is to the Latvian-born economist Carl Ballod, though some, including the British Library, suggest the author Gustav Jaeckh. There is a significant foreword (pp. V-XXIV) by the Czech-German philosopher and Marxist theoretician Karl Kautsky (1854-1938).
[VIVANT DE MEZAGUES].
Bilan général et raisonné de l’Angleterre, depuis 1600 jusqu’à la fin de 1761; ou Lettre à M. L. C. D. sur le produit des terres & du commerce de l’Angleterre.
First edition, a nice copy. ‘The object of the “letter” is to show that the wealth and trade of England were not greater than that of France. With this view the author examines into the balance of trade between England and other countries (including Ireland), the national income and debt, exchanges, imports and exports of bullion, war expenditure, etc. He concludes that England, after having been a gainer by her trade during the 17th century, was in 1761 a loser from a monetary point of view. He supports the argument by statistics from official and the best private estimates, and carefully considers objections. He calculates that the “territorial income” of England about 1760 was £20,000,000 sterling; also that from two-fifths to a third of the national debt was held by foreigners’ (Palgrave).