Correspondance inédite de l’Abbé Ferdinand Galiani, conseiller du roi de Naples... Édition imprimée sur le manuscrit autographe de l’Auteur, revue et accompagnée de notes, par M. ***... Précédée d’une Notice historique sur la vie et les ouvrages de l’Auteur, par feu Ginguené, avec des notes par M. Salfi...

Paris, Treuttel and Würtz, 1818.

Two vols, 8vo, pp. [4], cvi , 348; [4], 519, [1]; some foxing and light offsetting, else a good copy in contemporary cloth-backed marbled boards, spines decorated and lettered gilt, extremities rubbed and worn.


US $350€282

Make an enquiry

First edition, edited by Barbier, containing correspondence with Diderot, Grimm, Holbach, Morellet, and others.

Einaudi 2327; Goldsmiths’ 22017; INED 1947; Quérard III, p. 241.

You may also be interested in...


Abriss der Algebra der Logik. Bearb. im Auftrag der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung von dr. Eugen Müller. In drei Teilen. Erster Teil Elementarlehre.

First edition of the first of two parts of Schröder’s Abriss, edited by E. Müller and published posthumously in 1909 and 1910. Committed to the reform and development of logic, Schröder debuted in this field with a fundamental revision of Boole’s logic of classes, which emphasized the notion of the duality in logical multiplication and logical addition introduced by W. S. Jevons in 1864. ‘Although Jevons and Frege complained of what they saw as the “mysterious” relationship between numerical algebra and logic in Boole, Schröder announced with great clarity: “There is certainly a contrast of the objects of the two operations. They are totally different. In arithmetic, letters are numbers, but here, they are arbitrary concepts.” He also used the phrase “mathematical logic”’ (Encyclopaedia Britannica). Schröder’s declared aim in the field of logic was to facilitate the exact manipulation of relative concepts, and pave the way for a scientific ‘universal language’ built on signs rather than sounds.

Read more


Solid philosophy asserted, against the fancies of the ideists: or, the method of science further illustrated. With reflexions on Mr. Locke’s essay concerning human understanding. By J. S.

First edition. The best-known work of the Roman Catholic philosopher and controversialist John Sergeant (1623–1707). ‘The two philosophers to whom he is most opposed are Descartes and Locke, the “Ideists” whose distinction between ideas in the mind and external reality he saw as sowing the seeds for an incurable scepticism which he strongly attacked, but less clearly refuted. Locke is the main subject of his assault, no doubt because by this stage in the late 1690s it was Locke’s philosophy which was the centre of attention. In place of the strongly repudiated “Way of Ideas” Sergeant attempts to set a philosophy of “Notions”, a concept which some have seen, though on the basis of little evidence, as influencing Berkeley. Ideas Sergeant rejects because they close us off from the world of things – “Solid Philosophy” … Sergeant is a curious figure in the history of late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century philosophy, combining his scholastic roots with glimpses of the modern world into an unstable synthesis of Catholic theology (albeit unorthodox), scholastic philosophy and elements of Lockean epistemology, the latter appearing to be a source on which he drew (as Locke noted) despite his overt rejection of much of its content’ (Dictionary of seventeenth-century British philosophers, p. 724).

Read more