8vo, pp. [2 (title)], viii, 254, ‘247-558’ [i.e. 566], without a portrait (see below); part-title dated 1710; sporadic foxing with a few spots (mostly marginal); in contemporary English black morocco, boards gilt to a panel design with central armorial block in blind, spine richly gilt in compartments and lettered directly in gilt, edges gilt, marbled endpapers, endbands sewn in red and yellow on double cores, sewn two-up and bypass on 5 cords; lightly rubbed at extremities with a few minor scuffs, spine sunned, nonetheless an excellent copy; contemporary ink ownership inscription ‘I Bagot’ (?) to front flyleaf, and later eighteenth-century armorial block of William Bagot, first Baron Bagot, in blind to each board, twentieth-century private collector’s bookplate to upper pastedown.
Added to your basket:
Contemplations moral and divine, in two Parts.
An early eighteenth-century edition of Hale’s Contemplations in attractive contemporary English morocco. Though first and foremost a jurist, judge, and Commonwealth parliamentarian, Matthew Hale (1609–1676) wrote widely and extensively on other subjects: his Contemplations, first published anonymously in 1676, offer an epitome of his religious views which remained in print through much of the following century.
Provenance: from the Bagot library at Blithfield Hall, with the arms of William Bagot, first Baron Bagot of Bagot’s Bromley (1728/9–1798), Doctor of Civil Law (Oxon.) and Member of Parliament for Stafford from 1754 until his creation as Baron in 1780. He appears to have collected a substantial library of English and European books, with history, literature, and fine printing particularly well-represented; many are stamped with his armorial block, probably first cut while a baronet and amended after his elevation. The present volume does not appear among the 274 lots from Blithfield Hall dispersed by Sotheby’s on 26 November 1945.
ESTC T129379. ESTC’s reference to a portrait (as found in some other editions) is not supported by the digitised copies at the BL, BSB, or Princeton, by any other entry on OCLC (except those copied from ESTC), or by the only other copy recorded at auction.
You may also be interested in...
[MONTAGU, Mary Wortley (attr.), and PUISSIEUX, Madeline de (translator).]
La femme n’est pas inferieure a l’homme, traduit de l’anglois.
First French translation, uncommon, of Woman not inferior to Man: or, a short and modest Vindication of the natural Right of the fair-Sex to a perfect Equality of Power, Dignity, and Esteem, with the Men, first published in 1739 under the name ‘Sophia, a person of quality’ and sometimes attributed to Mary Wortley Montagu (1689–1762; see Quaritch, Women (2019) 36). Drawing on De l’égalité des deux sexes of Poulain de la Barre, the work examines the justness of the esteem (or lack thereof) in which men hold women, the relative intellectual capacities of the two sexes, whether men are fitter to govern and hold public office than women, and whether women are capable of teaching the sciences and serving in the military. The author concludes: ‘let us show [men], by what little we do without aid of education, the much we might do if they did us justice; that we may force a blush from them, if possible, and compel them to confess their own baseness to us, and that the worst of us deserve much better treatment than the best of us receive’.
MYERS, Robin, Michael HARRIS, and Giles MANDELBROTE (eds).
Lives in Book History: Changing Contours of Research over Forty Years.
‘This volume has grown out of one event in a long series of annual conferences on book-trade history – held to mark the fortieth conference in 2018. For this we had asked nine well-known book historians to give a retrospective review of their field, be it manuscripts, incunabula, book binding, and so on, explaining how they had come into book history, who had been the major influences on them, what the field was like then, what it was like now, and how they would, in the light of the changes they had seen, have done things differently. Everyone mentioned the technological revolution, which had completely changed their way of working and brought a wealth of research material to their desks, greatly amplifying but not substituting for (as they were at pains to point out) research in libraries and archives. Thus these papers are a mix of scholarly assessment and personal reminiscence: likely, we thought, to have a wider readership than just historians of the book.’