Small 4to., pp. , 59, , wanting the initial blank; cut close at the top shaving some headlines, H2-3 torn across and mended without loss of text, else a good copy in recent boards.
US $433 €390
Added to your basket:
A Sermon preached at St. Pauls March 27. 1640. Being the Anniversary of His Majesties happy Inauguration to his Crowne … London, Printed by Edward Griffin. 1640.
First edition of ‘a significant Accession day sermon’ (Oxford DNB) by the poet and royal chaplain Henry King, at this time Dean of Rochester, afterwards Bishop of Chichester. This sermon is a paean to the sovereign power of the King, taking as its text Jeremiah 1:10 (‘Behold, I have this day set thee over the Nations’).
The final prayer seems almost to foretell the events of the next decade. ‘And when the sad Day comes wherein He [the King] must exchange This Kingdom for a Better; Let His Crown of Gold be changed into a Crown of Glory.’
STC 14970; Keynes 54.
You may also be interested in...
REMEMBER, REMEMBER, THE FIFTH OF NOVEMBER…
[WILLIAMS, John.] The History of the Gunpowder-Treason, collected from approved Authors, as well popish as protestant.
First edition of an anti-popish history of the Gunpowder Plot. A well informed account drawing on both Anglican and Catholic sources, The History of the Gunpowder-Treason was published anonymously by John Williams (1633/6–1709), later Bishop of Chichester, amid renewed interest in the subject during the purported Popish Plot of 1678 to 1681. A prolific controversialist and staunch defender of Anglican protestantism, Williams used his History to urge readers not to forget the events of 1605, nor to disregard the perceived (and subsequently disproved) papist threat.
‘THE MOST SEDITIOUS BOOK THAT EVER WAS WRITTEN’ ROBERT, Southey.
Wat Tyler. A dramatic poem …
First edition of Southey’s republican verse drama, written at Oxford in three days in 1794. The manuscript had been left with Thomas Spence in prison for possible publication, but Spence had misgivings. Many years later ‘a mischievous publisher obtained a copy … and printed it. The publication was enormously successful, and was acutely embarrassing to a poet laureate, although he defended himself forcefully’, arguing ‘that his basic convictions had never changed’ (ODNB).