8vo, pp. 46; wood-engraved device to title page, arms of the assemblée nationale uniting royalist and revolutionary symbols; contemporary correction in ink.
US $323 €273
Added to your basket:
Décrets de l’assemblée nationale, concernant la division du royaume en 83 départemens.
[bound with:] DÉMEUNIER, [Jean-Nicolas]. Rapport sur la convocation de la premiere legislature … Paris, Imprimerie Nationale, 1791.
8vo, eight folding tables only.
One of three 1790 editions of the decree announcing the division of France into administrative departments, this edition with errors in the headings and spellings of several departments, for example the confused headings of Ain and Rhône et Saône. There is another edition which we have been unable to examine, with different collation and the ‘83’ in the title given in full as quatre-vingt-trois.
The tables bound in with the pamphlet are from a report on the meeting in May 1791 of the First Legislature, the first national body of elected officials in France. They illustrate the Assembly’s optimistic use of mathematics in the context of a logistical nightmare; figures are given for the population, size and contributions by taxation of each department, from which a representative number of delegates is calculated. The figures for population and taxation are thus ‘reduced’ by fractions to single digits, totalling 745 delegates from 83 departments.
‘The more Cartesian of the [Assembly’s] reformers sought to divide the country on purely mathematical principles: Sieyès in particular backed an ingenious scheme that would have combined an algebraic calculus of electoral representation with a geometrical analysis of space. The more realistic among them responded by respecting the traditional administrative and judicial practices wherever possible. The outcome inevitably, was something of a compromise between abstract principle and local interest … a barely concealed invitation to squabbles, divisions, and the settling of old scores’ (Allan Forrest, The Revolution in Provincial France, pp. 77-78). I: Rare in this edition. Not in Goldsmiths’; not in Collison-Black; COPAC lists two copies of another edition, both at the British Library, but none with this title and collation; OCLC lists four copies with this title and collation, at Columbia, Cornell, Freiburg and Zurich. II: OCLC lists 12 copies in French and American libraries; COPAC lists only two copies, both at the British Library.
You may also be interested in...
La vérité defendue pour la religion catholique. En la cause des Iesuites, contre le Plaidoyé d’Antoine Arnaud, par François des Montaignes.
First edition of Richeome’s vindication of the Jesuits against the charges made by Antoine Arnaud in his famous defence of the University of Paris in 1594. Richeome (1544-1625), known as the ‘French Cicero’, was one of the leading French Catholic controversialists of his age and played a crucial role in overcoming prohibitions against the Jesuit order in France. In La vérité defendue he constructs a history of the Society of Jesus from its foundation, highlighting its achievements in education and the work of Jesuit missions in Japan, the Far East, America, and Brazil. The work was translated into Latin the following year.
LE MERCIER DE LA RIVIÈRE, Paul Pierre.
Palladium de la constitution politique, ou Régéneration morale de la France: question importante proposée à l’examen des departemens, des districts, &c., & à la decision de l’Assemblée Nationale.
First edition, rare. Written late in Le Mercier’s life, this work calls for fundamental political and administrative reform of France’s educational institutions to better serve and strengthen the revolution and the regeneration of France. The author’s conclusion pulls no punches: the universities are incompatible with a free constitution, are useless, and are hotbeds of ignorance, pride and charlatanism; the long dominance of Latin and Greek should be abandoned and the education of France’s youth no longer entrusted exclusively to tonsured Masters of Arts and monks; and the colleges – described as morally and physically harmful to the young and an obstacle to all good education – should be suppressed.