Essay and Speech on Jewish Disabilities … edited, with an Introduction and Notes … second Edition.

Edinburgh, Ballantyne, Hanson, & Co. for the Jewish Historical Society of England, 1910.

8vo, pp. 69, [1], with frontispiece portrait and one plate; title printed in red and black within woodcut border; publisher’s blue cloth, upper board and spine lettered directly in gilt; a little bumped and rubbed at extremities, a few slight marks; inscribed by the editor ‘To Philip Isidore Rosenthal, on his Barmitzvah, with all good wishes, S. Levy, 20th Sept. 1919'.


US $81€69

Make an enquiry

Added to your basket:
Essay and Speech on Jewish Disabilities … edited, with an Introduction and Notes … second Edition.

Checkout now

Second edition of Macaulay’s speech and subsequent essay for repealing Jewish disabilities. Macaulay’s maiden speech in the Commons, delivered in April 1830, in favour of repealing Jewish disabilities, and the essay on the same subject published three weeks later, here printed as ‘a tribute to the memory of Macaulay in grateful recognition of his strenuous advocacy of the cause of Jewish emancipation’.

You may also be interested in...

LE BON, Gustave.

The psychology of revolution.

First edition in English, first published as La Révolution Française et la psychologie des révolutions (1912). Another of Le Bon’s psychological histories, on this occasion the focus is his own patrimoine.

Read more


Eloge de Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Discours qui a remporté le prix de l’Académie Françoise, en 1773.

First edition of Necker’s first work. Necker (1732–1804) was the opponent of Turgot (whose position he was to take over in 1777) in action as well as in theory, agreeing with Forbonnais on the side of State-regulation. The encomiastic function of this work, his first book, is in fact a thin cover for what is effectively Necker’s first exposition of his ‘interventist’ sensibility in economics. Here as in his later works Necker loses no opportunity of emphasising his dissent from ‘laissez-faire’ and the Tableau économique. His declamatory appeals to the rights of humanity and attacks upon landed property, though probably incited by political ambitions, bring him into close harmony with State-socialists, who, like himself, favoured substantial government intervention; and the Physiocrats had always to reckon with him as a determined adversary.

Read more