RELIGION IN THE ENLIGHTENMENT STATE

Concordia tra la società e la religione ossia Difesa del culto cattolico contro chi lo calunnia in contrasto colla società. Opera del Cittadino M.G.T. raccomandata alle podestà costituite del popolo Cisalpino. Seconda edizione.

Milan, Cesare Orena nella stamperia Malatesta, 1798.

8vo, pp. 198; clean and crisp throughout; in later cloth-backed marbled boards, spine lettered in gilt; light wear to extremities, joints cracked, but internally a good copy.

£385

Approximately:
US $467€455

Add to basket Make an enquiry

Added to your basket:
Concordia tra la società e la religione ossia Difesa del culto cattolico contro chi lo calunnia in contrasto colla società. Opera del Cittadino M.G.T. raccomandata alle podestà costituite del popolo Cisalpino. Seconda edizione.

Checkout now

Rare second edition, printed in the same year as the equally rare first, of this curious defence of religion in the light of the constitution of the Cisalpine Republic, in which the author seeks to demonstrate the compatibility of Catholicism with the Enlightenment ideals of the French Revolution and its aftermath.

Mascherana, who was a canon at San Babila in Milan and the author of several works on matters ranging from theology to aesthetics (sometimes using an anagrammatic pseudonym), argues that the people, even in the light of the new politics, can derive many advantages from religion, and that reason, although it can shed light on many matters, is not sufficient for knowledge of the truth. However, the first human duties, Mascherana argues, derive from natural law, and it is this that informs the rights set out in the Cisalpine constitution: freedom; equality, security; property. Analysing these rights (and their associated duties) Mascherana draws on the work of Rousseau, Montesquieu, Bayle, and Voltaire.

Mascherana was to follow up on the themes of this work with his two-volume Concordia della fede colla ragione per convincere che le idee soprannaturali non sono in opposizione colle idee naturali of 1806.

OCLC records only one copy outside Italy, at the University of Barcelona, with a further copy of the first edition at Ticino.

You may also be interested in...

LIFE OF THE BLACK HAITIAN SLAVE TURNED REVOLUTIONARY LEADER [COUSIN D’AVALLON.] 

Histoire de Toussaint-Louverture, chef des noirs insurgés de Saint-Domingue; précédée d’un coup d’oeil politique sur cette colonie, et suivie d’anecdotes et faits particuliers concernant ce chef des noirs, et les agens directoriaux envoyés dans cette partie du Nouveau-Monde, pendant le cours de la révolution ... 

First edition, uncommon on the market, of this biography of Toussaint Louverture (1743–1803), former slave and leader of the Haitian Revolution, complete with a famous portrait of him in military dress.  The only slave uprising that led to the founding of a state both free from slavery and ruled by non-whites and former captives, the revolution in Haiti, with Louverture at its centre, represents a defining moment in the history of the Atlantic world. 

Read more

ON CHARITY CORTÈS, Gioacchino. 

Dissertazione anti-Bolgeniana sopra la carità difesa dal suo autore l’abate Gioacchino Cortes contro il ch. Signor abate Gianvincenzo Bolgeni. 

First edition of this response to and attempted refutation of Bolgeni’s Della carità o amor di Dio by the Spanish Jesuit Joachim Cortès.  Della carità was the best-known work of the Jesuit theologian and controversialist Gianvincenzo Bolgeni, in which he had argued, against the Dominican de Rubeis, that the theological virtue of charity was rooted in the love of God due to God’s goodness to us, rather than due to intrinsic and absolute goodness.  This approach unsurprisingly resulted in a series of responses, often from Bolgeni’s former Jesuit confrères, among them Cortès, who published his Anti-Bolgeniana de Amore Dei dissertatio in 1790.  Here, Cortès responds to Bolgeni’s reply, addressing Bolgeni’s work in detail, quoting chapter and verse, and responding to each of Bolgeni’s attacks on Cortès, in which the Italian had attempted to argue that Cortès was a defender of Jansenist doctrines. 

Read more