The wonder working Water-Mill displayed with its Apparatus, Appurtenances, Appendages, and Operations; or, the Mill to grind old People young; erected and practised by the well known Doctor, the learned philanthropic Friend of Farmer Hodge …

Norwich: Printed by Crouse and Stevenson for the Author, and Yarington and Bacon, Norwich; and by giving Orders may be had of any Other Bookseller in London or Elsewhere ... 1791.

8vo., pp. xix, [1], 133, [1], possibly wanting a portrait; first eight pages printed on blue-tinted paper; a very good copy in modern quarter calf and marbled boards; bookplates of Arthur Dalyrmple and R. C. Fiske.


US $1082€930

Add to basket Make an enquiry

Added to your basket:
The wonder working Water-Mill displayed with its Apparatus, Appurtenances, Appendages, and Operations; or, the Mill to grind old People young; erected and practised by the well known Doctor, the learned philanthropic Friend of Farmer Hodge …

Checkout now

First and only edition, very rare, of this eccentric, provincially printed allegory: Pilgrim’s Progress meets Tristram Shandy.

Mendham begins by outlining his tale’s elaborate allegorical apparatus. The most important elements include the Mill itself, which represents ‘the true Church of God’; its hopper, which represents the ‘state of humiliation’; and its two grinders, which represent the ‘fear of destruction mixed with hope of deliverance’. To reach the mill, visitors must walk across the ‘meadow of contemplation’ which is apt to put them in a ready mood for conversion. The mill’s first few clients are easily processed: ‘they readily entered the hopper, passed between the grinders, and descended by the spout … astonishingly altered’. Trickier customers include ‘Lord Lothario’ and ‘Prim Pimp’. It also plays host to a celebrity guest, ‘Farmer George’ (evidently George III) who is suffering from a bout of madness and at one point ‘in the flurry of his mind’ strikes one of the mill’s attendants, knocking him ‘flat on his back’. They are followed by a Papist, a Presbyterian, a Baptist, a Methodist, and a Swedenborgian.

Thomas Mendham was obviously much influenced by the works of Laurence Sterne and imitates many of his narrative eccentricities. There are several prefaces addressed variously to ‘Brother Mortals’, ‘Kings, Peers, and Plebeians’, and ‘Candid Perusers’. Mendham also displays shimmers of Sterne’s typographic whimsy. At one point, a lull in conversation is represented as ‘————————— a pause ——————————’

Thomas Mendham may have been connected with Mendham Mill near Norwich, which was recorded in the Domesday Book and rebuilt in 1820.

Very scarce. ESTC records only three copies: at the BL, Norwich, and the University of Minnesota.

You may also be interested in...

BRONTË, Charlotte.

Le Professeur par Currer Bell … Roman anglais traduit avec l’autorisation de l’éditeur par Mme Henriette Loreau … Paris, Librairie de L. Hachette et Cie … 1858. [With:]

BRONTË, Charlotte and Anne. Shirley et Agnès Grey par Currer Bell. Romans anglais traduits par Mm. Ch. Romey et A. Rolet. Tome premier [–second] … Paris, Librairie de L. Hachette et Cie … 1859.

First editions in French of The Professor (1857) and Shirley (1849) by Charlotte Brontë and Agnes Grey (1847) by Anne Brontë (pp. 193-367 in Volume II), also attributed here to Charlotte. Loreau also produced translations of Dickens and Mayne Reid for Hachette.

Read more


Povesti. Nad propast’iu vo rzhi [Catcher in the Rye]… Rasskazyi.

First printing in Russia and first Russian translation of Catcher in the Rye (1951), together with other works by Salinger which also appear here for the first time. The translation of Salinger’s classic novel was approved by the censor, as they considered Holden Caulfield’s dissolute coming-of-age to be the perfect illustration of the manifold shortfalls of capitalism and the problems of bourgeois society. However, Caulfield’s systematic rebellion against established societal norms struck a chord with the multitude of those disenchanted with the political ideology of the Soviet Union, notwithstanding the fact that the translation was heavily censored, and it soon became a popular sensation. Catcher in the Rye represents an interesting twist on the social realism that was at the heart of the Soviet literary aesthetic; the Soviet hero had to be revolutionary, or at least a builder of the communistic future. In contrast, Holden Caulfield is deeply anguished and hopeless, an anti-hero. Intriguingly this places Caulfield firmly in sympathy with the Russian literary tradition of the 19th century, where the ‘hero’ is frequent deeply flawed, even depressed, à la Dostoevsky, or Goncharov.
This literary legacy is further cemented by the language of the translation. By Rita Rait-Kovaleva, a stalwart of the Soviet School of translation, this was the only authorized translation of CITR during the Soviet Union era. Unable to convince the editor to let her include Salinger’s frequent obscenities which are wholly omitted, she adopts an overall philosophy of domesticating the ‘Americanness’ of the work to suit its Russian audience, in the process making it seem much more of a literary work, which can in turn be interpreted as an act of rebellion. Suffering from the usual Soviet writer’s problem of being unable to write unrestricted, by creating a connection between this anti-hero and the great literature of the past, she arguably shows her own dissatisfaction with the Soviet modus vivendi. Her translation of the title as ‘Над пропастью во ржи’ [Over the abyss in the rye] was to give rise to the Soviet phrase ‘Пропаст капитализма’ [the abyss of capitalism]. Thus rendered, the title shifts the emphasis from Caulfield’s desire to be a catcher and protect little children from falling from the loss-of-innocence cliff, to the abyss itself. The choice of cover illustration, a boy standing gazing sideways into the invisible distance, is suitably liminal.
While further, uncensored, translations of the book did eventually appear in 1998 (Sergei Mahov), 2008 (Max Nemtsov), and 2010 (Yakov Lotovskiy), variously attempting to transmit the content of the English original, preserve the familiar nuance of the Rait-Kovaleva translation, and modernize, to date none of them ever achieved more than a passing success, with even variant translations of the English title incurring popular censure. Notwithstanding its faults, sanitization, and occasional mistranslations, the 1965 Soviet translation has come to be perceived as canonical, and constitutes the chosen text for most new printings.
Famously keen on anonymity, Salinger suppressed any photos of himself in print after the first issue of the American edition of Catcher in the Rye and divulged scant personal details to the press. Nonetheless, in the present edition his photograph (unattributed, and different from that of the first English edition) appears as a frontispiece, and the translator’s preface gives a brief resume of his life, including details of his upbringing, education and army service, which would certainly have been omitted from an English language edition of the same date. Rait-Kovaleva comments on his unwillingness to have a public presence, though remarking on the novel unconsciously being a very accurate reflection of the author and his state of mind: ‘His books tell us more about him and his world than all biographies’.
The other works in the collection are Raise high the roofbeam, Carpenters (1963), and several short stories: A perfect day for bananafish, The laughing man, De Daumier-Smith’s blue period, and Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut.
For analysis of Catcher in the Rye and its translations into Russian and Ukrainian in historical perspective, see Nataliya M. Rudnytska, Soviet Censorship and Translation in Contemporary Ukraine and Russia. In Translation Journal, Volume 17, No. 2, April 2013.

Read more