Two works in one volume, 8vo, pp. xi, , 132; [2 blank]; , 28; Say: with an extra leaf inserted after the half-title, bearing an engraved vignette showing a trial scene with a caption; fine copies, clean and crisp, uncut in the original orange boards, flat spine filleted in gilt with a contrasting gilt lettering-piece; some loss to orange paper at upper joint and foot of spine, label slightly chipped, some rubbing to covers and extremities; Say’s dedication inscription to Mr. Dubois Du Bais penned on an extra leaf inserted after the first title-page, and a later inscription by one of Dubois Du Bais descendants in red ink on the front free endpaper.
US $6483 €5542
Added to your basket:
Olbie, ou Essai sur les moyens de réformer les moeurs d’une nation.
Presentation copy with the author’s inscription of the rare first edition of Say’s utopia, written in response to a competition organised by the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques on the question: ‘Quelles sont les institutions capables de fonder la morale chez un peuple?’. Say treats the question from an economic viewpoint, and this work can, in some ways, be seen as a preface to his Traité d’économie politique of 1803.
With Olbie, ‘Say instaurait un ordre nouveau sur les ruines de la monarchie absolue, ordre basé sur la raison: “Ainsi le premier livre de morale fut-il, pour les Olbiens, un bon traité d’économie politique.” En Olbie, les femmes ont des emplois réservés à leurs capacités, les ouvriers des caisses de prévoyance. Enfin, l’oisiveté est stigmatisée, ainsi que les vices: “Il en coûte plus pour nourrir un vice que pour élever deux enfants”, lit-on dans les bâtiments publics’ (Versins, Encyclopédie de l’utopie et de la science fiction, p. 798).
The work bound after Say’s is an exceedingly rare item, of which one copy only is recorded in OCLC (BnF): a work of political philosophy which places the notion of force/strength at the centre of its examination of governments. The unidentified author sees the dynamics between government and oppositions in terms of physics: if the two opposing forces are equal, inertia is the result. This inertia is what blights many European governments, he claims. Public opinion is the resulting figure of the sum of individual minds. Any governing body ought to – first and foremost – count its heads. The author goes on advising states on how to deal with public opposition to taxation when seen as too high. His definition of a working and modern state, which he sees as a democracy, consists of ‘citizens all equal before the law; a monarch or head who is elected and temporary; a chamber of representatives re-nominated at regular intervals’ (transl. from pp. 18-19).
Say: Einaudi 5117; INED 4109; Kress B.4266; Negley 1002; not in Goldsmiths’; I. OCLC records only six locations in North America, at Columbia, Yale, Harvard, Virginia Tech, Berkeley, and the Hagley Museum; II. OCLC records only one copy, at the BnF.
You may also be interested in...
Opuscula Mathematica, philosophica et philologica. Collegit partimque Latine vertit ac recensuit Joh. Castillioneus [G.F. Salvemini] jurisconsultus.
First edition of Newton’s collected works edited and introduced by the Pisa alumnus Giovanni Salvemini da Castiglione. The edition contained twenty-six works which, while having appeared previously, were not easily accessible, from Newton’s mathematical works and optical lectures, which were greatly influential and laid the foundations of modern science, to his philological essays on history and theology. It thus became a major tool in the dissemination of Newton’s science and a major publication in the history of science.
MILL’S FIRST BOOK AND ONE OF HIS BEST MILL, John Stuart.
A System of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. Being a connected view
First edition. A System of logic is ‘The first major instalment of [Mill’s] comprehensive restatement of an empiricist and utilitarian position. It presents … a fairly complete outline of what would now be called an “empiricist” epistemology … It begins the attack on “intuitionism” which Mill carried on throughout his life, and it makes plain his belief that social planning and political action should rely primarily on scientific knowledge, not on authority, custom, revelation, or prescription…