8vo, pp. viii, 544; foxed and spotted throughout, with a short tear to the foot of p. 347, but a good copy in contemporary black embossed cloth, extremities chipped, hinges starting but firm.
US $2340 €1982
First edition, scarce in commerce, of this ‘significant contribution to American thought’ written by a Supreme Court judge who advocated the ‘popular election of judges for specific terms’ (Supreme Court of Ohio biographies online, ‘Grimke’). Grimke (1791-1862) studied at Yale and Carolina, rising quickly to become a judge of the Court of Common Pleas and then of the Supreme Court (‘Publisher’s Preface’ to The Works of Frederick Grimke, 1871). This work is divided into four books which treat government and elections, the constitution, institutions (medical, religious, military etc.), and the American constitution the context of European government.
‘All governments are to a degree dependent upon the manners, habits, and dispositions of the people among whom they subsist. This connection is closer and more striking where the institutions are democratic […] In a commonwealth, where the standard of popular intelligence is high, and no impediment exists to the exercise of that popular authority which rightfully springs from such a state, the people may truly be said to create and to uphold the government. On the contrary, where the population is sunk in ignorance and apathy, government assumes the character of a self existing institution, for there is no power beyond to direct and control it. In one instance, the will of society impresses itself as an active power upon the institutions, both ordaining and controlling them: in the other, for defect of will, the government is simply permitted to be what chance, or circumstances originally made it. The political institutions of Russia, and the United States, equally depend upon the social organization; but in the former the influence is negative, in the latter it is direct and positive. In the former, the people, by their inaction, contribute to rear the fabric of despotism; in the last, they have created free institutions’ (pp. 4-5).
Sabin 28855; COPAC cites just one copy (British Library); within Europe, WorldCat locates only one further copy (Bibliothèque National de France).
You may also be interested in...
Ars notarilis auctore celeberrimo D’Adda. In Mediolanensi Archigimnasio iuventutis beneficio utiliter et ingeniose composite et caractere Felicis Viglezzi descripta.
Fair manuscript copy, in all likelihood a presentation copy, of a text of notarial law which remained a reference in Italian jurisprudence from the Austrian times until well after Napoleon, by one of the most prominent Milanese jurists of Enlightened Lombardy. The scribe identifies himself as Felice Viglezzi. It is accompanied by a manuscript celebrating the life and commemorating the death of the Milanese vernacular poet Domenico Ballestrieri.
AZUNI, Domenico Alberto.
Systême universel de principes du droit maritime de l’Europe . . . Traduit de l’italien, avec des additions du même auteur.
First French edition. Azuni’s own translation, with additions, of his principal work on maritime law, Sistema universale dei principii del diritto marittimo dell’ Europa (1795). ‘The first volume . . . is devoted to the sea and to the rights that can be exerted over it, and has an almost exclusively historical character. The author narrates the history of the maritime power of the chief states; considers the various theories relating to the extension of territorial waters; examines what rights can be exerted over them and over fisheries, straits, bays, gulfs and anchorages, and briefly passes in review the maritime laws of the principal states of his time. In the second book, which deals with the maritime law of Europe in wartime, he deals especially with relations between belligerents and neutrals . . . . [He] shows that neutrality is founded not only on particular treaties between the neutrals and the belligerents but also on the very nature of international relations. The sole obligation incumbent on neutrals is to remain impartial. In all other things they have the right to continue as before their relations with the belligerents . . . . Azuni extends the jurisdiction of neutral courts on prizes taken to them and in cases of litigation as to the neutral or enemy quality of goods and ships, especially if the goods and ships are claimed by subjects of the local sovereign. The last part of the book deals briefly with the right of asylum, with reprisals in time of peace, with privateers and pirates’ (Sereni, The Italian conception of international law p. 146).