4to in 8 and 6, pp. , 4-27, , with copper-engraved title vignette, woodcut ornaments and initials throughout; minor foxing to first and final leaves, but a very good copy in recent paste-paper backed boards with patterned paper sides, gilt paper lettering-piece to spine, uncut with deckle-edges.
US $752 €642
Added to your basket:
Favola di due gatti e della scimia coll’ appello de’ medesimi gatti all’ orso, divisa in due parti, componimenti di diversi pastori d’Arcadia.
First complete edition. A rare fable in parallel Latin and Italian verse by members of the Accademia dell’Arcadia, comprising Due gatti ed una scimia (first published in 1728) and the first appearance of the second part, Appello de’ due gatti all’ orso. Both are published only pseudonymously under the pastoral names assumed by Arcadians, the first part being authored by ‘Nadisto’ and ‘Ergisto Balirio’, the second by ‘Telindo’ and ‘Nicotele’, all members of the prestigious literary society for the promotion of pastoral poetry over the grandiose baroque style popular at the time. This simple fable in traditional metrical forms, attributed to the fabulist Francesco Lelli, is a fine example of their ideals.
OCLC records only five copies worldwide and none in the UK.
You may also be interested in...
The Whig Club, or a Sketch of modern Patriotism, comprising the following Characters: Mr. F–x, Lord H––d, [and 72 others] &c. &c. &c.
First edition of Pigott’s satirical ad homines attack on the Whigs. The Whig Club ‘offered a scurrilous account of ‘offered a scurrilous account of élite London society, with which [Pigott] seems to have been well acquainted’ (ODNB). The text was issued also by Crosby, and both booksellers released a second edition within the year.
TOOKE, John Horne.
Two pairs of portraits, presented to all the unbiassed electors of Great-Britain, and especially the electors of Westminster.
First edition of this celebrated comparison of two generations of Pitts and Foxes, by the clergyman and political radical John Horne Tooke. Although one might have thought him more naturally a Foxite, Tooke never got on with Fox, and here lays out, side by side, the ways in which Pitt father and son exhibited wisdom and probity, in comparison with the rather different characteristics exhibited by the Foxes. Horne finishes with two questions: ‘1st question. Which two of them would you chuse to hang up in your cabinets; the Pitts or the Foxes? 2d question. Where, on your conscience, should the other two be hanged?’