8vo, pp. xxiv, 792; pp. [xvii]–xxiv (table of contents) misbound into the final gathering; a nice, clean copy in contemporary marbled stiff-paper covers, a little rubbed, remains of paper label to spine.
US $1305 €1113
Added to your basket:
Anregungen für philosophisch-wissenschaftliche Forschung und dichterische Begeisterung, in einer Reihe von Aufsätzen eigenthümlich der Erfindung nach und der Ausführung …
First edition, rare, of a comprehensive discussion by the author of his personal philosophy, with c. 50 pages of his poetry thrown in at the end for good measure. Samuel Hahnemann refers to the work in Die chronischen Krankheiten (1828–30), calling Buquoy a ‘deep-thinking, many-sided scholar and indefatigable investigator of truth’. He also notes Buquoy as a practical connoisseur of homeopathy.
Born in Brussels into a distinguished noble family and educated in Vienna and Prague, Buquoy (1781–1851) took over his uncle’s entailed estates in Bohemia at the age of 22, where he set about introducing improvements in the various local industries, such as glass manufacture. The several glass factories were renowned for the quality of their production, especially of hyalith (black opaque glass, in imitation of stone), the recipe for which was discovered by Buquoy himself in 1816; the finished articles were sold in Prague and Carlsbad and also exported to a wider European market, including Vienna and Budapest. Although a student of law and philosophy, Buquoy’s interests were broad, and included mathematics, technology, physics, chemistry and economics. His Die Theorie der Nationalwirthschaft (1815–8) is an early ‘strikingly modern’ work in that latter field (see Robertson , ‘Mathematical economics before Cournot’, Journal of Political Economy LVII (1949), 527). Schumpeter calls Buquoy ‘a very interesting man: a great Austrian nobleman, very wealthy, very radical (as an old man he took part in the revolution of 1848) … Man and writings are forgotten unjustly, so I think’ (History of Economic Analysis, p. 502).
Not in OCLC or RLIN, which list 2 copies only (Yale and Princeton) of the 1827 edition.
You may also be interested in...
A PRELUDE TO L’ESPRIT DES LOIS MONTESQUIEU, Charles de Secondat.
Histoire véritable publiée d’après un nouveau manuscrit avec une introduction et des notes par L. de Bordes de Fortage.
Second edition of Montesquieu’s philosophical, quasi-oriental tale, a prelude to his great work L’Esprit des lois. Written in the 1730s and again in 1754, and influenced by Lucian and the 18th-century vogue for oriental fiction, the Histoire véritable remained unpublished until 1892. This 1902 second edition is based on a manuscript written prior to that used for the first. The Histoire is a fabulous account of the numerous animal and human incarnations experienced by its narrator: as a little dog he is persecuted by his mistress, while as an ox he is worshipped by the Egyptians; as a human his soul occupies the bodies of a hangman, a cuckolded husband, an underfed poet, a courtier, a fop, a virtuous woman, a eunuch, an African chief, a king’s fool, among many others. ‘The different reincarnations are so many opportunities to expose human turpitude from the inside and to underscore, from the vantage point of a single conscience, retrospectively enlightened, the corruption and wickedness of men ... Montesquieu’s originality is to create, based on conventional processes of narrative fiction at the time, a philosophical tale inducing meditation about the conditions of virtue and happiness ... The Histoire véritable would also raise, in the story’s framework, questions to which L’Esprit des lois would try to respond: how to reconcile relativism and norms of universal justice, articulate uniformity and diversity, find constancy in change? To this degree, the work would be, as Alberto Postigliola put it, an “epistemological prelude” to its author’s major work’ (Carole Dornier in Dictionnaire Montesquieu).
Remarks on Dr. Price’s observations on the nature of civil liberty, &c.
First edition, one of two issues published in the same year. A reply to and critical commentary on Richard Price’s discussion of American independence, reaffirming the English claim to sovereignty over America. Possibly penned by a member of Hume’s circle, the pamphlet was judged to be ‘written with less invective, and more decency, candour and moderation, than have lately appeared in the productions on that side of the American dispute’ (Sabin).