8vo, pp. xiv,  errata, 266; a fine, uncut and unopened copy in the original boards, contemporary MS lettering to spine.
US $765 €635
Added to your basket:
Practical Remarks and Precedents of Proceedings in Parliament; comprising the Standing Orders of both Houses, to the end of the year 1801; relative to the applying for, and passing, bills for inclosing or draining lands; making turnpike roads, navigations, aqueducts; building bridges; for the more easy recovery of small debts; paving, &c. towns; confirming or prolonging the term of letters patent; obtaining divorces; and bills called estate bills: with an introductory chapter, containing practical directions for soliciting private bills in general; and with occasional references to acts of Parliament, adjudged cases, &c.
First edition of the earliest comprehensive treatment of the important subject of private bill legislation, being a greatly revised and enlarged version of the author’s Solicitor’s Instructor in Parliament concerning Estate and Inclosure Bills (1799). Further, updated editions and supplements were published down to 1813.
By the turn of the nineteenth century, dramatic changes resulting from economic development and population growth in Britain had created considerable pressure for improvement of the infrastructure and local administration of society. There was no impetus towards nationwide action by the state until much later, while existing local authorities were inadequate for the task. Much of the onus of meeting new demands for investment in and management of infrastructural projects therefore fell to local parties acting privately. ‘Private’ or ‘local’ (as opposed to ‘public general’) legislation, to promote individual projects of land enclosure, transportation, drainage, town improvements, social policy, and so on, took on a new importance.
The present work by Charles Thomas Ellis was of great service in providing, for the first time, a practical guide to the rules governing parliamentary private business, which had evolved rapidly in the preceding few decades. Its publication coincided with moves to establish a better means of coping with the ever-increasing flow of private business in Parliament. A Select Committee Report on the matter in 1810 (the first of ten such reports by 1847) led to the establishment of the Private Bill Office at Westminster, after which lawyers acting as external parliamentary agents – among whom Ellis was a pioneer – began to take over the drafting of legislation from the parliamentary clerks.
See Sidney and Beatrice Webb, English Local Government: Statutory Authorities for Special Purposes (1922), p. 5n, where the present book is cited first in a chronological list of publications on the subject; The History of Parliament. The House of Commons, 1790–1820, ed. R. G. Thorne, vol. I, pp. 335 and 339. For a recent historical work stressing the importance of private acts in the evolution of English local government, see John Prest, Liberty and Locality (1990).
Sweet and Maxwell III, 71; cf. Marvin, p. 291 (the 1810 edition).
You may also be interested in...
[TOOKE, John Horne, and Charles James FOX.]
Proceedings in an Action for Debt, between the Right Honourable Charles James Fox, Plaintiff, and John Horne Tooke, Esq. Defendant, published by the Defendant.
First (?) edition of a protest against the bribery used in Westminster elections. A popular candidate in the constituency of Westminster, Horne Tooke lacked official backing in the election of 1790 and spent only £28 on his campaign, polling behind Fox and Hood. He subsequently challenged the result, but met with no success. ‘By an act of 1789 Horne Tooke was liable for the costs incurred, and Fox accordingly brought an action against him for the taxed cost of his expenses. The case was heard before Lord Kenyon on 30 April 1792, and despite Horne Tooke’s able harangue on corrupt electoral practices a verdict was found in favour of Fox. The trial proceedings were published as a pamphlet and reissued in 1812 and 1819.’ (ODNB).
Letters to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, occasioned by his Reflections on the Revolution in France, &c.
First edition, one of three variant Birmingham issues in 1791. In these letters Priestley defends the principles of the French Revolution against Burke’s attack in the Reflections on the Revolution in France, which appeared in 1790. The Birmingham riots of July 1791 saw Priestley’s home attacked by the mob, forcing him to relocate to Hackney in London where he had sympathetic friends such as the radical printer Joseph Johnson.