8vo bifolium, pp. 3 + 1 blank; creases where folded, remains of black seal to last page, good.
US $210 €171
Huskisson was a leading exponent of strict adherence to the Gold standard and an opponent of the perceived over-issue of bank notes in the early nineteenth century. This letter was written only a few months after Huskisson had published his important pamphlet, The question concerning the depreciation of our currency stated and examined, which appeared in October 1810 and soon went through seven editions.
The present letter is a reply to a correspondent holding ‘ingenious arguments in favor of our present currency’. Huskisson states that ‘whilst I am unable to concur in them, I could wish that all who write on the same side of the question would discuss it with the same temper and fairness as yourself. By so doing, they would, I think best promote the purposes of fair discussion and … the interests of the cause which they undertake to defend’. One point on which he does agree with his correspondent, however, is ‘that Bank notes must be made a legal tender, if our currency is to remain what it now is’.
You may also be interested in...
An Inquiry into the revenue, credit, and commerce of France. In a letter to a member of the present parliament.
First editions. These three pamphlets all stem from the debate in the House of Lords of 1 June 1742 on the Trade & Navigation Bill. They all hinge on a single aspect of the debate – whether France could fund another war from her export and import revenues.
Grundgesetze der Volkwirthschaft und Besteuerung. Aus dem Englishen übersetzt von Dr. Ed. Baumstark … Zweite durchgesehene, verbesserte und vermehrte Auflage [from general title: Erster Band. Übersetzung].
Complete second edition of the second German translation of Ricardo’s Principles, based on the third English edition of 1821. The first edition of this translation was published in 1837, based on the second English edition (1819) as the translator was unable to obtain a copy of the third; a companion volume of commentary by the translator followed in 1838. This second edition was in fact issued without the commentary, the latter being reissued in 1905 as a separate work (although in an entirely revised, i.e. rewritten form by Karl Diehl (1864–1943), professor at Königsberg and, later, at Freiburg, who dedicates his labour to the 70-year-old Adolf Wagner), but is offered here to complete the set.