FABLE OF THE BRUTES

: or, a modest Search after the great Plunderers of the Nation: being a brief Enquiry into two weighty Particulars, necessary at this Time to be known. I. Who they are that have plundered the Nation. II. Why they are not detected and punished.

London, Printed in the Year, 1711.

8vo., pp. [2], 88, with half-title (slightly torn), a little dust-soiling to half-title and edges, but a very good copy, untrimmed; disbound.

£350

Approximately:
US $465€416

Make an enquiry

Added to your basket:
: or, a modest Search after the great Plunderers of the Nation: being a brief Enquiry into two weighty Particulars, necessary at this Time to be known. I. Who they are that have plundered the Nation. II. Why they are not detected and punished.

Checkout now

First edition, the issue with ‘known. I.’ (rather than ‘known, viz. I.’) on the title-page, and with ‘against’ and ‘publick’ spelled correctly on pages 11 and 25. As the half-title and title-page form a bifolium cancelling A1 (the text begins on A2, page 3), the two variants were probably printed together work-and-turn.

The preamble to the patent creating Harley a peer had recited his public services and praised him for preventing ‘the further plundering of the Nation’. Who were the plunderers? The former Whig ministry, according to Tory propagandists, who murmured charges of bribery, misappropriation, fraudulent victualling, over-mustering, and expenditure beyond the Estimates. But ‘innocent Men’, writes the author, may be ‘pointed at for Politick Designs, to blacken their Reputation [and to] confirm Faction ... the Guilt charged upon them in the publick Discourse of the Town, cannot be proved’. Let the new ministry look to its own management of state affairs. The pamphlet ends with a fable of the Commonwealth of the Brutes: ‘There was ... a Season when ... the Horses were accused to the Lyon of having mismanaged and misbehaved in the publick Trusts ...’

Swift apparently had some hand in writing the fulsome Latin preamble to Harley’s patent, with its remark about plundering the nation; and he has also been credited with translating the preamble into English (Journal to Stella, I, 265n., and DNB). The sometime attribution of the pamphlet itself to Defoe is no longer considered likely. Kress 2746.

You may also be interested in...

[MACKENZIE, Lieutenant-Colonel George, and others, defendants.]

The Trial, before the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland, at the Instance of Daniel Ross, Woodsawer in Aberdeen; against Lieutenant-Colonel George Mackenzie, Captain Felix Bryan Macdonough, Serjeants Andrew Mackay & Alex. Sutherland, all of the late Regiment of Ross & Cromarty Rangers: for the Murder of John Ross, late Soldier in the Corps of Riflemen, in the Streets of Aberdeen, on Fourth of June, 1802.

Sole edition. This controversial trial was brought as a private prosecution after the Lord Advocate, Charles Hope, had decided not to prosecute any officers or soldiers for killing four peaceable inhabitants of Aberdeen after celebrations of the King’s birthday on 4 June 1802 had got out of control. Men and boys in Castle Street in high spirits were pelting each other with dirt, straw, and garbage, when Mackenzie and Mcdonough, who had been drinking with the magistrates and were rather intoxicated, walked back to their barracks and were pelted too. Soldiers from the Ross & Cromarty Rangers then joined in, apparently without orders. While soldiers and citizens jostled up and down Castle Street, Mcdonough attempted to calm the situation. Presently he ordered the soldiers to prime and load to intimidate the crowd, but then ordered them to withdraw to their barracks. Mackenzie meanwhile stayed in his quarters. Later the soldiers came out again, and on three occasions deliberately took aim and fired on the populace, although it was not clear whether any command to fire had been given. A serjeant was at the head of the group that shot John Ross, but he was not positively identified as one of the defendants.

Read more