8vo, pp. 336 + errata-leaf; French bibliographical note to head of half-title ‘tgl. Sechehaye, Ff 44, 217-241, l’ecole genevoise de linguistique générale. Schuchardt, L. Bl. 1917, 1-9’; another to first leaf of preface, making reference to Schuchardt and C. Herman, a few pencil underlinings and side-notes, mild browning; a good copy in the original printed paper wrappers, edges and joints a little worn, spine split but holding, small loss to foot of spine; signatures ‘F Muller(?)’ to upper wrapper and first blank, preserved in a cloth box with leather label.
US $3137 €2561
Rare first edition. In general the study of language in the 19th century concerns philology. While great steps were made at the beginning of that century to put the study of language on a scientific basis, the vital distinction was not made between philology and non-historical linguistics. Saussure made this distinction and gave it its classic formulation. Consequently, for all subsequent linguistics, and especially structuralism, that linguistic theory in which freedom from the influence of philology is most enjoyed, Saussure’s position is that of a major thinker and of a founding father.
Saussure insisted that language is a system which can be viewed under two aspects, diachronic and synchronic. Diachrony is the mode under which the system evolves through time, and hence includes not only philology but also the more modern discipline of lexico-statistics, or glotto-chronology. Synchrony is the mode in which the system exists at a single time, a cross-section, as it were, of its diachronic development, and it is under this aspect that structuralism has developed its study of language.
Other distinctions made by Saussure, of which the influence on structuralism cannot be overstressed, are those between langue and parole, and signifiant and signifié.
Saussure’s influence outside linguistics has been great. He made the call for a ‘general science of signs’, for which he coined the term ‘semiology’ (the cognate term ‘semiotics’ is associated mainly with the American tradition, in which writers like Peirce and Morris were developing similar ideas independently of Saussure). This general science of signs came to encompass the work of many disciplines, perhaps most notably anthropology, where Levi-Strauss began to view anthropological data as forming a system in which each part helps determine the significance of the others.
The text of the Cours de linguistique générale was prepared by two pupils of Saussure from his lectures at the University of Geneva and published posthumously.
You may also be interested in...
VAUBAN, Sébastien Le Prestre de (1633-1707), Marshal of France and military engineer.
Manuscript certificate signed by Vauban (‘Le Mal. de Vauban’) certifying the brave service and injury in action of one Captain Beaufort.
In his capacity as ‘commissaire general des fortifications de France, gouvernour de la citadelle de Lisle’, Vauban here certifies that Captain Beaufort, an engineer in the Dauphin’s regiment who had served the king well in the Dutch campaign of 1672 and then at Oudenaarde, is unfit for service following an injury to his right hand by a grenade at the siege of Besançon.
AMERICA’S ROLE IN WORLD BALANCE OF POWERA RARE EXAMPLE WITH UNIFORM VARIANTS [SAINTARD, Pierre-Louis de].
Roman politique sur l’état présent des affaires de l’Amérique, ou Lettres de M***. à M***. Sur les moyens d’établir une paix solide & durable dans les colonies, & la liberté générale du commerce extérieur.
Rare first edition of Saintard’s influential work on the international balance of power, in which he considers the consequences of the presence of European colonial powers in North America. The text is presented as a series of letters dated from July to September 1756, on the eve of the Seven Years’ War, and seeks to find a balance of power among the colonizing nations which would eliminate war and encourage commerce. To preserve peace in Europe, Saintard advocates the avoidance of conflict in the French and British colonies and freedom of the seas.