[WESTMINSTER ELECTION.]
A True and impartial Collection of Pieces, in Prose and Verse, which have been written and published on both Sides the Question during the Contest for the Westminster Election. In which are inserted, a great Number of serious, humorous, sarcastical, and witty Papers; omitted in the two Pamphlets already published on that Subject, &c. &c. &c.
London: Printed for W. Owen … 1749.
8vo., pp. [4], 91, [1]; small tear in gutter of title and first page, but a very good copy; disbound.
Added to your basket:
A True and impartial Collection of Pieces, in Prose and Verse, which have been written and published on both Sides the Question during the Contest for the Westminster Election. In which are inserted, a great Number of serious, humorous, sarcastical, and witty Papers; omitted in the two Pamphlets already published on that Subject, &c. &c. &c.
First edition. A compilation of open letters to the electorate of Westminster, written during the violent 1749 election campaign. Despite the brutality which characterised the election the editor hopes the letters might be impartially considered for their merits: ‘As many smart pieces were written in defence of each worthy candidate, the collecting them together in this manner, may not be unacceptable to the Public’.
The majority of the entries are signed by the defending MP [Viscount] Trentham (honorary title of Granville Leveson-Gower, afterwards first Marquess of Stafford). Trentham, opposed by Sir George Vandeput (whose missives also appear here), was narrowly re elected with Bedford’s support but the election was so vicious that Vandeput’s chief agent Alexander Murray, among others, was imprisoned in Newgate for acts of incitement.
Other inclusions appear under a variety of patriotic monikers and include satirical poems, explications of policy, anti-French sentiments, arrangements for hustings and factional meetings in coffee shops, as well as an oath made by one John Haines, in which he defends Trentham’s honour and denies his Francophilia, which was sworn ‘before me, H[enry] Fielding’.
You may also be interested in...
LAMB, Charles.
John Woodvil a Tragedy ... to which are added, Fragments of Burton, the Author of the Anatomy of Melancholy.
First edition. John Woodvil was Charles Lamb’s first play (or dramatic poem), regarded by him at one time as his ‘finest effort’, a ‘medley (as I intend it to be a medley) of laughter and tears, prose and verse, and in some places rhyme, songs, wit, pathos, humour, and, if possible, sublimity’ (Lamb to Southey, 28 November 1798). He began it in August 1798 and considered it ‘finish’t’ in May 1799, but continued to tinker with it for nearly three years. John Philip Kemble declined it for production at Drury Lane in 1800, and it was never acted.
WITH ASSISTANCE FROM JOHN EVELYN SPRAT, Thomas.
Observations on Monsieur de Sorbier’s Voyage into England. Written to Dr. Wren ...
First edition. When Samuel de Sorbière published his polemical Relation d’un Voyage en Angleterre (1664), touching on defects in the English nation and character, Thomas Sprat, afterwards Bishop of Rochester, composed an angry reply in the form of a letter to Christopher Wren (both were stalwarts of the Royal Society). Sprat was encouraged in this effort by John Evelyn, who described Sorbière as a schoolmaster, apostate, mountebank, and critic who owed his position as self-styled Historiograph du Roy to sycophantic flattering of Cardinal Mazarin (Evelyn to Sprat, 31 October 1664). Sprat’s reply to Sorbière’s ‘insolent Libel on our Nation’ is a wide-ranging defence of the sovereign, the church, the Royal Society, Hobbes, the English stage, the English language, and even English cookery. It was a popular vindication, twice reprinted.