Nouveaux principes d’économie politique, ou de la richesse dans ses rapports avec la population … Tome premier [– second].

Paris, Delaunay, Treuttel & Wurtz, 1819.

Two vols, 8vo, pp. [4], VIII, 437, [1]; [4], 442, [2, advertisements]; very light occasional foxing, but a very good, clean copy; bound in contemporary half sheep, flat spines filleted in gilt, gilt lettering-pieces to spines; front board of vol. I detached, vol. II rejointed, spine extremities and joints worn, with small chips to the head of spines; armorial bookplate of Daniel Cresswell to front pastedown.

£850

Approximately:
US $1157€979

Add to basket Make an enquiry

Added to your basket:
Nouveaux principes d’économie politique, ou de la richesse dans ses rapports avec la population … Tome premier [– second].

Checkout now

First edition. ‘A number of concepts and theories that later became important in the history of economics first appeared in the writings of the Swiss economist J. C. L. Simonde de Sismondi … Sismondi developed the first aggregate equilibrium income theory and the first algebraic growth model. Yet both concepts had to be rediscovered and redeveloped by others before they entered the mainstream of economics, long after Sismondi’s time’ (New Palgrave IV, pp. 348 ff.).

‘An early work, De la richesse commerciale (1803), was a perfectly traditional exposition of the doctrines of Adam Smith … [His] Nouveaux principes … , untranslated into English to this day, marked his turn-around to a more critical attitude to free trade, laissez-faire and industrial capitalism. Convinced that the new industrial system was doomed to suffer recurrent depressions and a chronic tendency towards under-consumption, he was particularly struck by the labour-saving bias of technical progress to which he saw no answer except government intervention of a far-reaching kind, including a guaranteed minimum wage in and out of work, a ceiling on hours of work, a floor and ceiling on the age of work, and the introduction of profit-sharing schemes.

‘Sismondi met Ricardo, Malthus and Say, was cited by Malthus, McCulloch, Torrens and John Stuart Mill, but only to be generally condemned by everyone except Malthus. As a matter of fact, it is evident that the Nouveaux principes had a profound influence on Malthus’s own Principles of political economy (1820) … Indeed, the Keynesian flavour is even stronger in Sismondi than in Malthus, and it is he and not Malthus whom Keynes should have hailed as his forerunner’ (Blaug).

‘In many ways Sismondi also anticipated Marx. Sismondi’s emphasis on “the proletarians”, on an increasing concentration of capital, recurring business cycles, technological unemployment and economic dynamics in general all reappeared (without credit) in Marx’s writings’ (New Palgrave IV, p. 350).

Einaudi 5306; Goldsmiths’ 22333; Kress C.427; de Salis II, 62; Sraffa 1354. See Blaug, Great Economists before Keynes, p. 228 ff., and Schumpeter, pp. 493–6.

You may also be interested in...

THE ROLE OF CONSUMERS’ ACTION
AN ALTERNATIVE TO MOST SOCIALIST THOUGHT
WOOLF, Leonard.

Socialism and Co-Operation.

First edition. In the interwar period Woolf was ‘a patient and committed advocate for a cooperative model of participatory, rank-and-file democracy founded on the organization and practices of the Co-operative Movement, whose socialist, transformative aspirations Woolf found most fully realized in the Women’s Co-operative Guild under the leadership of Margaret Llewelyn Davies. Woolf’s interest in radical democratic templates places him in a line of British utopian thought that looks to small-scale models of popular self-government as test cases for overall social transformation—ranging from Robert Owen’s communes, through William Morris’s medieval craft guilds, to the guild socialism advocated by G. D. H. Cole and R. H. Tawney. At the same time, in identifying the consumer rather than the producer as the means and ends of social change, Woolf’s proposals for a socialist commonwealth emerge as an alternative to most socialist thought, a rarely examined case in a British politics of consumption which, as Matthew Hilton has shown, has traditionally offered itself as a “middle” or “third way” solution to a party political system dominated by the interests of capitalists and workers’ (Koppen, Participatory Democracy and the British utopian Tradition: Leonard Woolf’s co-operative Commonwealth in Historical Perspective (2024), abstract).

Read more